Photo Democracy
Doesn’t get my vote.
I read an article recently in a rather highbrow publication which praised a certain photographer’s work as democratic. A decade ago when intellectuals were pushing for the democratization of photography this might have been a compliment, today it is not.
To be fair, I didn’t actually read the article, but I did read the headline and I looked at the pictures. In my opinion the pictures were boring, poorly composed, and technically lacking. They are the work of a photographer mimicking the work of amateurs with the hopes of pushing his viewer’s nostalgia button. It’s what film directors do when they license a classic pop song to play over a montage. It’s a cheap trick. Sometimes it works on regular folk, but when it comes to still images, it only seems to work on intellectuals who are writing about photography.
A classic example of choosing style over substance.
None of this will come as a surprise to me, nor will it to anyone else who’s been paying attention. It’s hardly worth writing about, except I feel it’s important to push back on the democracy narrative and where it’s recently taken photography.
Like so many other movements, it sounds nice on the surface. Photography is for everyone. It needs to be democratic!
